Kel Kelly

Hey, thanks for swinging by my blog.

Whether it’s breaking news, Web 2.0, public relations, marketing, start-ups or whatever, I promise to wade through the bullshit and give you my unbuffered perspective.

You’ll note I never take on a “corporate tone” — whether I’m chatting you up at a party or speaking to the CEO of a multi-billion dollar company, my voice never changes. I say what’s on my mind and I’m often the champion of the underdog. It’s how I roll.

I’m a Web 2.0 junkie and smoke Google Analytics in a crack pipe to get my day going. I hope my immersed insight and offbeat view make you laugh. More importantly, I hope you take a second and share your thoughts by posting a comment. If you have any ideas on how to make my blog better, shoot an email to kel@kelandpartners.com.

Peace out.

Today’s Social Marketing: Chicka Chicka Yea!

March 22, 2009 11:34 AM

I remember driving in the early 1970s, rolling down the window and tossing out an empty bag of McDonald’s. As disgusting as it is to think about, everyone littered and nobody knew any better. A common afternoon in the seventies included eating a baked potato saturated with a stick of butter for lunch, having a few drinks before getting behind the wheel of a car to drive to the beach, and smoking cigarettes while holding up a silver reflector to get a tan on skin that was soaked in baby oil. Seriously. WTF were we thinking?

What happened to not only change my perspective, but the perspective of a nation when it came to littering, drinking and driving, smoking and skin cancer? The answer is social marketing. Wikipedia defines social marketing as “the systematic application of marketing along with other concepts and techniques to achieve specific behavioral goals for a social good.” In 1974, the anti-litter Public Service Announcement (PSA) “The Crying Indian” launched. The spot featured a native American canoeing through polluted water, landing on a beach littered with trash and turning to show a tear rolling down his cheek. Sounds corny to today’s oh-so-cool and jaded consumer but back then it acted as the catalyst to ignite a change in behavior that still lives today. The PSA won two Clio awards and AdAge picked it as being one of the top 100 advertising campaigns of the 20th Century.

Back in the day when McDonalds chicken included knee caps, elbows and ear lobes, social marketing was primarily executed through TV and print. There was really no viral spread beyond word-of-mouth limited by traditional communication channels: face-to-face, phone and letters. Today’s Web 2.0-driven world has acted like a steroid injection to social marketing. A campaign that used to take months, if not years, to have an impact now sees action in a matter of days or sometimes even prior to the campaign launch.

As an example, look at the campaign “Spread the Word to End the Word.” The campaign’s thrust is to get people to recognize and rethink (and hopefully stop) their use of the “R-word” as it is offensive to the friends and families of the millions of people with intellectual disabilities. The “national awareness day” and official launch of the campaign isn’t until 03.31.09, yet social media has already given the message a platform, voice and following. The Facebook group alone has close to 1,000 members. Yes, the membership number may be modest, but remember the campaign has not even launched yet. Given time, hopefully it will rise to the level of the Feed A Child With Just One Click Facebook group and its 4.1+ million members.

Think about it. A marketing campaign having impact and getting traction before it’s official launch and before any money has been spent. Chicka chicka yea! For us marketeers, life doesn’t get any better. For those who the campaign is intended to benefit, one can only hope that their life does in fact get better. Thanks to Web 2.0, it certainly has a better chance of making that happen.

What social causes have you supported through your social media activity?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Posted by Kel | in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

2 Comments on “Today’s Social Marketing: Chicka Chicka Yea!”

  1. Mark Palmer Says:

    Ear lobes? Since when do chickens have ear lobe — uh, never mind!

    I agree with the sentiment behind this R-word thing, but I think it has tactical problems.
    For one thing, it’s very difficult to convince people to *not* think or say something.

    If I tell you not to speak the word ‘apple’, you’re going to spend all day thinking about apples. Even if you are one of the 99% who would never think of them in the first place..
    (in fact, when I first read this, I assumed the R-word was “race”)

    Better to offer a replacement *vision* that is positive and catchy. PC replacement *words* take on negative connotations eg ‘challenged’, or like when Obama said his bowling style fit better in the special olympics – that was clearly an attempt at self-deprecating humor, but people attacked him for even mentioning it – even though he tried to use PC words.

    I may have to try that mirror-suntan trick soon, though.

    JMHO

  2. Kel Says:

    mark, i hear what you are saying regarding planting something inside someone’s head that may never had appeared there. in this case i think it is more about changing a behavior that already exists. i have a friend who uses the r-word all the time. when i finally brought it up to him and explained why some may view it as offensive, it was as if a light bulb went off. he said he just never thought of it that way. the word “gay” gets tossed around the same way amongst teenagers. most kids have no idea it would be offensive to many kids who perhaps are gay themselves or have gay parents or friends. i think the intent of the r-word campaign is to raise awareness that using it is considered hurtful by many. i think getting even one person to rethink using the word would make it a successful initiative.

Leave a Reply

Connect with Facebook

Alternatively, use the form below.

« Back to text comment