<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media&#8217;s Boiled Frog Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kelandpartners.com/kelkellyblog/2008/02/15/medias-boiled-frog-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kelandpartners.com/kelkellyblog/2008/02/15/medias-boiled-frog-effect/</link>
	<description>be SEEN.  be HEARD.  be UNDERSTOOD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kel Kelly Blog - 2008 - August - 08</title>
		<link>http://www.kelandpartners.com/kelkellyblog/2008/02/15/medias-boiled-frog-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Kel Kelly Blog - 2008 - August - 08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k2blog.kelandpartners.com/?p=29#comment-562</guid>
		<description>[...] switch approach to the change is what sent so many people off the deep end. I attribute this to the &#8220;Boiled Frog Effect&#8221; &#8212; the change was too much and too fast for most people. As a result there has been a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] switch approach to the change is what sent so many people off the deep end. I attribute this to the &#8220;Boiled Frog Effect&#8221; &#8212; the change was too much and too fast for most people. As a result there has been a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel Kelly Blog - Politicians Easily Susceptible To Viral</title>
		<link>http://www.kelandpartners.com/kelkellyblog/2008/02/15/medias-boiled-frog-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Kel Kelly Blog - Politicians Easily Susceptible To Viral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k2blog.kelandpartners.com/?p=29#comment-378</guid>
		<description>[...] that we all still laugh. Why? War and the economy aren&#8217;t funny. Do you think it&#8217;s the Boiled Frog effect &#8211; after years of hearing things like Bush&#8217;s quote on &#8220;using the google&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that we all still laugh. Why? War and the economy aren&#8217;t funny. Do you think it&#8217;s the Boiled Frog effect &#8211; after years of hearing things like Bush&#8217;s quote on &#8220;using the google&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.kelandpartners.com/kelkellyblog/2008/02/15/medias-boiled-frog-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k2blog.kelandpartners.com/?p=29#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Erin on this one - it is clearly a cry to be infamous.  Almost every shooter has made references like &quot;now I will be famous&quot; in their final letters.  I&#039;m not sure, however, if avoiding mass coverage of the events would be the anecdote.

What really scares me are the college-level shootings.  These kids clearly are stable enough to go through high school, do well enough to be admitted into a college, and then go on to commit these atrocious acts.  These aren&#039;t just losers who work in bottom-rung positions (excluding the mall shooter form this past Christmas - he was just fired from McDonald&#039;s).  This means they can&#039;t be picked out of a crowd - they aren&#039;t always social misfits.  They aren&#039;t the &quot;bad guys&quot; you see in movies.  

I think the deluge of coverage for the mall shooting was mainly because it was so different from the usual (it disgusts me to have to use that word) school shootings, but especially because millions of people could relate - going to the mall a lot in December is basically a part of our culture now.  

I was surprised at the coverage as well, but I am weirdly happy that they aren&#039;t covering it too much - it gives the shooter less notoriety.

Plus, the cynic in me says that technically, Obama winning over Hillary has a much larger affect on your everyday life - especially if it is somewhat guaranteed that a democrat will take the White House come January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Erin on this one &#8211; it is clearly a cry to be infamous.  Almost every shooter has made references like &#8220;now I will be famous&#8221; in their final letters.  I&#8217;m not sure, however, if avoiding mass coverage of the events would be the anecdote.</p>
<p>What really scares me are the college-level shootings.  These kids clearly are stable enough to go through high school, do well enough to be admitted into a college, and then go on to commit these atrocious acts.  These aren&#8217;t just losers who work in bottom-rung positions (excluding the mall shooter form this past Christmas &#8211; he was just fired from McDonald&#8217;s).  This means they can&#8217;t be picked out of a crowd &#8211; they aren&#8217;t always social misfits.  They aren&#8217;t the &#8220;bad guys&#8221; you see in movies.  </p>
<p>I think the deluge of coverage for the mall shooting was mainly because it was so different from the usual (it disgusts me to have to use that word) school shootings, but especially because millions of people could relate &#8211; going to the mall a lot in December is basically a part of our culture now.  </p>
<p>I was surprised at the coverage as well, but I am weirdly happy that they aren&#8217;t covering it too much &#8211; it gives the shooter less notoriety.</p>
<p>Plus, the cynic in me says that technically, Obama winning over Hillary has a much larger affect on your everyday life &#8211; especially if it is somewhat guaranteed that a democrat will take the White House come January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.kelandpartners.com/kelkellyblog/2008/02/15/medias-boiled-frog-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k2blog.kelandpartners.com/?p=29#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I find this sort of thing fascinating, and I&#039;m instantly teleported back to &quot;Intro to Communications&quot; my freshman year of college in which we tirelessly analyzed the media&#039;s coverage in our quest to become responsible and noble journalists.

I too was struck by how small this story seemed in the way it was reported. But what about the Louisiana Technical College shootings that happened just a week ago February 8th, in which three people were killed. This event was even less of a blip on the media’s radar. IS it the lower death tolls?

What else could be at play? Is it that these two schools have less visibility than Virginia Tech, a well-known university and an athletic powerhouse? I wonder too if the media is responding to critiques that days of coverage gives the shooters&#039; recognition and the glorified notoriety they are looking for (Seung-Hui Cho, perpetrator of the Virginia Tech shootings, wrote about becoming famous and even sent his own writings to NBC News.)

One optimistic note: Despite the media coverage or lack there of, it does not seem that colleges have numbed to this tragic possibility. Syracuse University, and the University of North Carolina at Greensboro (two schools I know of personally) have both staged mock events within the past year to train and test emergency response teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this sort of thing fascinating, and I&#8217;m instantly teleported back to &#8220;Intro to Communications&#8221; my freshman year of college in which we tirelessly analyzed the media&#8217;s coverage in our quest to become responsible and noble journalists.</p>
<p>I too was struck by how small this story seemed in the way it was reported. But what about the Louisiana Technical College shootings that happened just a week ago February 8th, in which three people were killed. This event was even less of a blip on the media’s radar. IS it the lower death tolls?</p>
<p>What else could be at play? Is it that these two schools have less visibility than Virginia Tech, a well-known university and an athletic powerhouse? I wonder too if the media is responding to critiques that days of coverage gives the shooters&#8217; recognition and the glorified notoriety they are looking for (Seung-Hui Cho, perpetrator of the Virginia Tech shootings, wrote about becoming famous and even sent his own writings to NBC News.)</p>
<p>One optimistic note: Despite the media coverage or lack there of, it does not seem that colleges have numbed to this tragic possibility. Syracuse University, and the University of North Carolina at Greensboro (two schools I know of personally) have both staged mock events within the past year to train and test emergency response teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.kelandpartners.com/kelkellyblog/2008/02/15/medias-boiled-frog-effect/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k2blog.kelandpartners.com/?p=29#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Remember Columbine? Trench coat mafia. The guy in the mall a few months back. How about the guy in Texas who started all this mayem... in the 60&#039;s who shot up his campus? Marshfield (Mass.) High could have had the same thing happen to them if someone hadn&#039;t alerted authorities. Can&#039;t be video games. They weren&#039;t around in the 60&#039;s. Overbearing parents? Too much Mr. T, not enough Mr. Rogers? Who knows. But the one common denominator in all these shootings is the ready availability of guns. It will happen again and again. Count on it. Maybe we should embrace the opposing view to gun control. Allow concealed weapons for every breathing person. If these kooks even remotely thinks anyone could &quot;make their day&quot; they may think twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Columbine? Trench coat mafia. The guy in the mall a few months back. How about the guy in Texas who started all this mayem&#8230; in the 60&#8217;s who shot up his campus? Marshfield (Mass.) High could have had the same thing happen to them if someone hadn&#8217;t alerted authorities. Can&#8217;t be video games. They weren&#8217;t around in the 60&#8217;s. Overbearing parents? Too much Mr. T, not enough Mr. Rogers? Who knows. But the one common denominator in all these shootings is the ready availability of guns. It will happen again and again. Count on it. Maybe we should embrace the opposing view to gun control. Allow concealed weapons for every breathing person. If these kooks even remotely thinks anyone could &#8220;make their day&#8221; they may think twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
