ABC/Facebook vs. CNN/YouTube Debates

January 6, 2008 5:43 AM

Last night was the ABC/Facebook debate. I’m sure the partnership was put together on the heels of the wildly successful CNN/YouTube debate.

So which media outlet won in the debate wars? CNN/YouTube hands down. Why? They won because CNN fully embraced the essence of YouTube and its user-generated content (UGC). The entire debate was driven by UGC. CNN’s role was simple — pick the appropriate UGC video questions to ensure a broad range of topics were covered, and then act as the facilitator to ensure that the presidential candidates answered – and I use that term loosely – the questions. In addition to its UGC, YouTube’s fun, anything-goes personality came through and was refreshing for the viewers.

Given Facebook’s 50,000,000+/- members, ABC had a huge opportunity to tap into some great UGC. Unfortunately, they didn’t. The debate was a typical ABC-driven, dull traditional media event. Aside from a Facebook logo and an occasional gratuitous survey generated by Facebook, the debate had absolutely no sign of UGC or Facebook. None. Zip.

As a Facebook addict, I watched the debate on TV while being logged onto Facebook. Since ABC chose not to have a live Facebook question thread I would have hoped at a minimum they would have used some of the interesting, eye-popping Facebook survey data being generated live on the site. Those of us logged on saw that immediately after the Republican debate Facebook asked its members: “Which Republican candidate appeared most “Presidential” during the debate?” Ron Paul won with 41% of the vote. Hello? Ron Paul? Does anyone else think that is a bit of eye-popping UGC? I do. Apparently ABC did not. That would be way too out there for the ABC brand. (For the record I am not a Ron Paul supporter).

When CNN allows a snowman to ask a question about global warming, they fully embrace the essence of user-generated content and run with it. When ABC lets Charles Gibson ask the questions and only puts a few safe Facebook survey questions up on the screen, they do not. It’s a shame. This was ABC’s opportunity to come out of the dark ages and leverage a white-hot brand like Facebook to help illuminate the ABC brand. They blew it.

Which media outlet do you think won the debate wars?

Posted by Kel | in Uncategorized |

One Comment on “ABC/Facebook vs. CNN/YouTube Debates”

  1. Erin Says:

    I absolutely agree with this analysis! For at least the entire week leading up to Saturday’s debate, there was a large ad at the top of my media feed for this debate, and I genuinely took interest in both learning more about the candidates AND seeing how facebook would integrate into a debate. I was equally disappointed to find that the facebook essence was nowhere to be found once the debates actually got started.

    On one hand, if just the facebook logo got some people to watch a debate they wouldn’t have otherwise, I would consider it a successful move. But they missed out on keeping those viewers by not integrating UGC.

    I also thought Anderson Cooper did a better job of moderating the CNN/YouTube debates…

Leave a Reply